Hello everyone,
I know there´s a book thread, but since there´s a topic on the Colonel, I´ll post it here...
Has anyone ever read the book by Alanna Nash "The Colonel - The extraordinary story of Tom Parker and Elvis Presley"?
Alanna Nash was one of the journalists who attended the public viewing of Elvis´body. When doing research for her book she found out that Tom Parker might have been involved in a murder case back in the Netherlands, and therefore left the country, only to become an illegal alien in the US.
Basically her book gives a rather balanced view on the Colonel and it´s definitely worth reading. It was one of the first I ever read on Elvis, because the Colonel was my ultimate scapegoat. Well, it´s not that easy, but I´m still not convinced that he really meant well...
If you´re the personal manager, your client comes first. But in the Colonel´s case, he himself always came first. He sure was a great promoter in the beginning, but he had no taste, no sensitivity for his artist and was only after the money. No one in the industry really liked him, obviously.
Anyway, Alanna Nash has a website,
www.colonelparker.com, where you can find an interview she did with the elvisinfonet.com. Here´s an excerpt, where she talks about involving a medium in her research.
Read the full interview here:
http://www.colonelparker.com/interviews_with_the_author2.htm
...
EIN: The principal issue being focused on by critics and readers is the possibility that the Colonel (aka Andreas Cornelis van Kuijk) fled his native Holland after brutally murdering a woman. You are very clear in The Colonel that there is no direct evidence linking him to the murder but you deftly present a case based on circumstantial evidence. Do you have a personal view on this particular incident?
AN: I wholeheartedly believe that the Colonel had a secret that was far more sinister than simply that of being an illegal alien. He had numerous opportunities to fix that little problem, and he never did. I have no idea whether he killed that woman or not, but a situation of this magnitude certainly would explain why he behaved as he did, and why he wouldn’t risk a background check or becoming a citizen. My guess is that he was involved in some way, and that it was an accident. In the book, I quote a letter he wrote to his nephew in Holland, in which he alludes to missing his family, and not getting in touch with them as to protect them, almost, from something in his past, or as he puts it, “mistakes some-one may have made.”
It’s interesting: After I finished the manuscript, I spoke with an English medium, Jennifer MacKenzie. She “saw” the Colonel by my using only his Dutch name. She didn’t know who he was. She said, “Was he a politician?” I said, “No, but people have likened him to one.” She was quiet, and then she said, “Was he a murderer? Because I’m seeing something beneath a kitchen floor.” As you’ll remember from the book, Anna van den Enden was killed in front of the kitchen sink. Well, that just flabbergasted me. I spoke to Jennifer again later and she “channeled” him. I asked point blank if he had killed Anna. Jennifer said he put his finger to the side of his nose (which was a habit of his when he was having fun with you) and said, “That’s for me to know and for you to find out.” I said, “Ask him if he’s mad at me--if he’s going to give me a hard time in the hereafter.” She said no, that he felt fatherly toward me, and then she added, “He says no one can hurt him now.”
Whether you believe in that kind of stuff or not (and, of course, it’s all for entertainment and you can’t base research on it), it’s pretty fascinating. But here’s the bottom line to all of this. I cannot prove he did the deed, but I can prove he was capable of it. That army discharge paper is incontrovertible proof of that. “Constitutional psychopathic state” is 1933 language for what we now call Anti-Social Personality Disorder. Which is how we classify most murderers.
...
Thanks for reading throught this rather long post!!!
Ingrid